The research of EVPs

Found some good articles about the study of EVPs:

 

https://mysteriousuniverse.org/2013/11/study-claims-evps-persist-even-in-controlled-environments/

 

https://atransc.org/radiosweep-study2/

 

So in the second article they write that “I calculated an index of personal agreement that tells us how good each rater was at hearing the most common interpretation. Individual raters agreed with the group consensus between 17% and 35% of the time, with an average of 22%. That is, the “best” rater agreed with the group consensus interpretations on 35% of the EVP, and the “worst” rater agreed on 17% of the EVP. When analyzed at the level of the word rather than the entire EVP, the percent of raters who agreed with the group consensus varied from 31% to 51%, with an average of 38% of the words. So, if we play the average EVP to a large group of people, the average person will agree with the consensus interpretation of the entire EVP 22% of the time but agree with 38% of the words.”

 

Still it all is dubious in statistics, and my theory is about some spiritual channels – extra spiritual files that get switched to our brains when we listen to EVPs. Ghosts agreed that it is an interesting topic too. I think there’re different levels of access to the info (levels of consciousness) in the Matrix. Though the places in which some strange noises appear are clearly seen in programs, the interpretation of such “noise” varies greatly, in spite of the fact that everyone thinks “I hear it so well and distinct!” It’s like “48 people heard exactly that word, but 79 people heard something else”.

 

So in a way visual images received from the afterworld are a better proof than audiofiles, it helps to draw attention to the whole problem of ITC, that skeptics deny.

 

What I wrote about it earlier:

 

https://bullfrogr.wordpress.com/2018/12/03/i-was-partly-wrong-about-evps/

 

https://bullfrogr.wordpress.com/2018/10/20/their-wish-to-be-deaf/